Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devil Dolls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Devil Dolls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted as it fails WP:LINKFARM by being a collection of mostly internal red links. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 04:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It was in a sorry state when it was nominated, but I've since cleaned it up and added sources. The best rule of thumb when finding articles is to try to spruce them up before nominating them, as AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP. That said, this did give the article the needed TLC so there shouldn't be any issues with it meeting NFILM now, so no true harm done. Just be more careful next time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep following User:Tokyogirl79's TLC. Bondegezou (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.