Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sign of the Moon
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:49, 12 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 00:49, 12 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Warriors (novel series)#Warriors: Omen of the Stars. JForget 01:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Sign of the Moon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced speculation about a future book release. Fails WP:V, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:N. PROD/PROD2 removed without explanation. I42 (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as book whose release date is too far in the future for any reliable sources to exist. Also, possibly create lock/saltRedirect to Warriors (novel series)#Warriors: Omen of the Stars, then possibly semi-protect the article until November, 3 months before release date. Brambleclawx 23:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Delete- Ahh I did not see this but yes, I agree with Brambleclawx on this. Derild4921☼ 01:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Agree with others Redirect to the article instead of delete. Derild4921☼ 17:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Delete because there is not enough information, and the book is not yet even close to being released. ••Pepper•• 13:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with the above. Oceansummer87 (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the parent series until/unless there's some actual coverage. No reason this can't be a redirect, but I don't see any reason for it to be more than that at this point. Jclemens (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the release date is too far away to eaven decide if the tribe of rushing water is in the book.Sorry.--GIRbookworm (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect, just so people looking for the book will at least get to a coherent page that isn't "create this article". sonia♫♪ 14:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Racepacket (talk) 20:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.