Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gia DeSantis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by SheepLinterBot (talk | contribs) at 00:00, 14 February 2023 (→‎[[Gia DeSantis]]: [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are not based in policy or practice.  Sandstein  09:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gia DeSantis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable radio/TV personality. Mrfrobinson (talk) 02:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  06:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  06:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  06:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it? In what capacity did she work as a DJ? Both references only list her as working there nothing specific. Just because she worked as a DJ at a major radio station does not make her notable. Mrfrobinson (talk) 20:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 09:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.