Talk:Mirtha Arce/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SusunW (talk · contribs) 21:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC) I'm stuck on 2 different articles waiting on sources, so I'll look at another of these from the 2022 WIG submissions. Thanks for creating another interesting article on a Bolivian woman. The article is well-written and covers the important details, filling a gap in our coverage of Bolivian women. I'm a pretty picky reviewer and could find very little that needed to be addressed. A review of all source material that was accessible, verifies the information in the article is supported by the sources, except as noted below, i.e.:

• Vargas & Villavicencio p 174 says she was born in Salta, Argentina – parents were from in Tarija, where she grew up.
  • Yeah... This source occasionally gets funky with the birth dates and names. I try to go by it unless other sources indicate otherwise. In this case, Romero Ballivián (also cited in that paragraph), her official government profile, and her electoral register all place her birth place as being Tarija/Cercado. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't see any of those cites in the paragraph, but confirmed Romero Ballivián says that, as does the government profile which appears only as an external link. I added the cite, as it is a simple fix. SusunW (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Other comments:

• Link Juan Misael Saracho University
  • Done. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• Perhaps mention as per Cantín that she served four and a half years as a substitute deputy.
  • Done... kind of. I mentioned span of committee assignments, which correlate with length of term. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• How long was her Senatorial term?
  • Are the dates under "Commission assignments" sufficient or would you prefer something more explicit in-text? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• Mark Página Siete as {{subscription required}}. I cannot access any of them, even from the archived links.
  • Done. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Please ping me when you have had a chance to correct these minor issues. SusunW (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

@SusunW: Should be set for the most part. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 02:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Krisgabwoosh I think we are good, except the first comment hasn't been addressed. If you can fix her place of birth I can pass it, but I have an appointment and will be gone for a few hours. SusunW (talk) 15:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

@SusunW: Ah, must've missed it. I've responded with an explanation. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Krisgabwoosh I just added the cite and am passing it now. Give me a few minutes to do the technical stuff. SusunW (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.