Jump to content

User talk:Sebsf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:32, 18 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

1919 penny is an old coin ...and if you have any info, leave behind some comments. You may also leave comments about other things as well. — Sebsf (talk)

Comment please

[edit]

If you come across this page please comment — Sebsf (talk)
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.110.77.92 (talkcontribs)


I see Anonymous has commented lots of 'k's

[edit]

If you would like to comment, click the plus sign near the top of the page and add comment there. Thanks! — Sebsf (talk)

Exactly?

[edit]

How exactly? I'm very confused.

How on earth does an innocent person realise that the struggles of understanding the simplest of messages aren’t going to cause heartbreak?

I believe that this page is actually getting some hits…I think I might expand and try and get double the no. of hits — Sebsf (talk)

Been working...

[edit]

I thought I'd come back and work on this for a while and give it a well-done revamp. Nice to express facts and feelings while remaining anonymous. Might not be back for a while. Feel free to comment below and enjoy your stay. — Sebsf (talk)

Gregorian calendar

[edit]

You made an error in your discussion of the Gregorian calendar on your user page User:Sebsf#How we could've be freezing in the middle of summer. Pope Gregory did not make years divisible by 4000 common years. That was a suggestion made by the English astronomer John Herschel during the nineteenth-century (see Gregorian calendar#Accuracy). It is actually detrimental to the accuracy of the Gregorian calendar because it makes the average Gregorian year more closely approximate the mean tropical year (365.2422 days), but the papal bull Inter gravissimas clearly stated that its intent was to prevent the vernal equinox from again receding from March 21. It just so happens that the vernal equinox year (365.2424 days) is quite close to the average Gregorian year (365.2425 days). A discussion of this subtle difference is at Error in statement of Tropical Year. The papal bull only has rules using division by 4, 100, and 400 years. See paragraph 9 of the bull at Inter Gravissimas (Latin, French, English). — Joe Kress (talk) 01:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to the commment made by the previous person regarding the Gregorian Calendar. It seems that my source that I managed to gather the information from was inaccurate and thank you for the views. If you ever come across here again, tell me how you actually managed to come across this page. Thanks for visiting!! — Sebsf (talk)

You attempted to add a link to your user page to both Julian calendar and Gregorian calendar (both of which I "watch") which I reverted because Wikipedia does not allow that. Nevertheless, I consulted your user page, read your discussion, and decided to respond. Because I responded, Wikipedia flagged your page so I would be notified of any change via the automatic checking of "Watch this page" just below the edit window. A list of all changes to pages I "watch" are displayed whenever I click "My watchlist". I see that you have not been welcomed to Wikipedia. Please read the following links. — Joe Kress 05:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sebsf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

[edit]

You have twice changed the wikilink for the song "*** you!"/"Forget you" to remove the word "***" from the link. Firstly, this changes the link so that it does not accurately point to the song article, which has the word "***" in the title. Secondly, to remove the word from the link is to censor the page, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Please do not make this change again. 99.192.77.179 (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um...that wasn't me. I was the one who put in the original title in the first place. I don't know where you got the idea I was censoring the link from... Sebsf (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise to 99.192.77.179 As I stated, I didn't make the change... As you may have noticed, you actual typed the profanity, but they have become asterisks after I placed in my first comment. That's due to stupid Google Chrome, which automatically turns the profanity into *** even while I am editing this page (I can't type the word because of that). As a result, I unknowing changed the title in Cee Lo Green's song from the profanity to ***. Once again, I apologise and will try to avoid using Chrome in future edits of article. Sebsf (talk) 04:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the song name was kept as "F**k You!" instead of "Fuck You!" (I'm not usually Google Chrome anymore), then none of the accidental changes that my browser caused would have happened. Clearly, if the link was kept as "F**k You!" it would have still worked, but somebody changed it...

...

After a bit of soul searching, I found who changed the link in the first place. Here is the culprit . Ironically, when Cluebot reverted a correction made by 99.192.92.150, which occurs right here, I actually reported Cluebot for a false positive when I caused the disruption in the first place. So I would like to thank 99.192.92.150 and/or 99.192.77.179 (since you are probably the same person) for noting that problem, otherwise I would have never found out and inadvertently kept making that automatic edit again.

P.S. I just kindly made another false positive report Sebsf (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is below if the link doesn't work

(talk) (contributions)
Posted by ClueBot Commons (talk) on 06:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Information

[edit]

ID: 8522
User: 99.192.77.179
Article: The X Factor (Australia season 2)
Time: 2010-11-02 14:43:26
Diff: [1]
Heuristic: smallchange/obscenities
Regular expressions matched:

  • 1 * "/fuck/i"
  • 1 * "/fuck ((yo)?u|h(er|im)|them|it)/i"


Reason: making a minor change with obscenities

What happened

[edit]

The song title in the wikilink actually contains an obscenity, which links to another page in wikipedia. This was corrected because another user inadvertently changed the song title from the obscenity to ***. This user made a good edit to remake the link back to the real title, and hence Cluebot has detected a false positive.

Discussion

[edit]

DJ Havana Brown

[edit]

Image of DJ Havana Brown Sebsf (talk) 00:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hey what's up, I'm the creator of the DJHB Fansite and I'd love to help contribute to her Wikipage, please give us a hoy if you still want help on the page :) AussieCatDoll (talk) 05:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Text

[edit]

There is hidden text here regarding the formatting of a table. Feel free to take a look at it by removing the hidden comment markers. Sebsf (talk) 03:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Please confirm your membership

[edit]

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 20:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Sebsf/DJ Havana Brown

[edit]

User:Sebsf/DJ Havana Brown, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sebsf/DJ Havana Brown and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Sebsf/DJ Havana Brown during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Oz talk 11:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]