User talk:(CA)Giacobbe/Archive 4
Notes on a Conditional Form
[edit]I really don't have time for this. Why are you removing sourced content in this page. Regardless of the number of sources, the genres can still be included. You didn't really give a good explanation for this in your edit summaries. Bowling is life (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Bowling is life: The content is not removed, it's already been included within the prose and mentions his evaluation of the album. The problem becomes if you base the genres off of his review (a single critic), you'd need to include all the genres mentioned by every reviewer. We'd end up with dozens of genres. Experimental is in there since several critics called it such. I'd be happy to work with you to find more sources to build a stronger consensus for what you've added. Giacobbe talk 00:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For your massive expansion of music articles including Frail State of Mind and TooTimeTooTimeTooTime! — Bilorv (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC) |
Commons files and copyright
[edit]Hi (CA)Giacobbe! As with the barnstar above, I saw your contributions to TooTimeTooTimeTooTime and Frail State of Mind and they're really good and real improvements to the articles. However, I noticed that you added some images to Commons for use in the articles, two of music video screenshots and one of an artist, taken from a news article about them. These files are all copyrighted and as such cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. In the case that you see images of artists or other living people on Wikipedia, these are (almost without exception) only images published under free licenses, compatible with CC-BY-SA. By default, an image is copyrighted and the copyright holder has to publish it under a less strict license for it to be usable by us. In the case that you see music video frames or other non-free images on Wikipedia, these are uploaded locally to Wikipedia and have (or should have) detailed fair use rationales which justify its inclusion under U.S. fair use law and our more strict internal rules, the Non-free content criteria. The screenshots you uploaded probably fail our criteria because they are not (as far as I can see) specifically the subject of substantive critical commentary (e.g. "the colour pink in this scene connotes that ...") by professional critics. Likely no shot of either music video satisfies that criterion, so we can't have an image from them.
As such I've nominated the Commons files for deletion. Hope this is clear enough but I'll be watching this page and please do ask any follow-up questions if anything is even slightly unclear—a lot of people on Wikipedia get confused when it comes to copyright, Commons and the NFCC. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your GA nomination of Frail State of Mind
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frail State of Mind you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 13:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frail State of Mind
[edit]The article Frail State of Mind you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frail State of Mind for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frail State of Mind
[edit]The article Frail State of Mind you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Frail State of Mind for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thank you for your speedy and detailed review, friend! Cheers! Giacobbe talk 15:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Guys (song)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Guys (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Guys (song)
[edit]The article Guys (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Guys (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 10:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Guys (song)
[edit]The article Guys (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Guys (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of H? -- H? (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America
[edit]The article Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America
[edit]The article Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 00:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)
[edit]The article If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)
[edit]The article If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of People (The 1975 song)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article People (The 1975 song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of People (The 1975 song)
[edit]The article People (The 1975 song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:People (The 1975 song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of People (The 1975 song)
[edit]The article People (The 1975 song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:People (The 1975 song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Me & You Together Song
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Me & You Together Song you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 04:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Me & You Together Song
[edit]The article Me & You Together Song you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Me & You Together Song for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Birthday Party (song)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Birthday Party (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Me & You Together Song
[edit]The article Me & You Together Song you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Me & You Together Song for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of H? -- H? (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Please see my comments on this nomination. I have a question there that you'll need to answer before it can pass. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Birthday Party (song)
[edit]The article The Birthday Party (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Birthday Party (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Birthday Party (song)
[edit]The article The Birthday Party (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Birthday Party (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Me & You Together Song at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)