Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Free Hans/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations‎ | Free Hans

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:49, 19 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)



Free Hans

Free Hans (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date August 9 2009, 18:56 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here)

All the users have been created when a user was blocked or recently unblocked, only for making it look like the blocked /unblocked account has been sockpuppeting. I know of some more so I will add them later, because I don't know the exact name. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
The Benmols2 appears to be mirroring WebHamster's style. Far to closely to be a genuine sockpuppet of that user, its just too obvious that this is meant to look like that user. This needs to be looked into, and much more deeply then I could. A check on all involved IP's plus (if posible) a wider search to see if any other black Sock accounts exists masceradibng as WebHammster.Slatersteven (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. WebHamster can be difficult, but this doesn't feel like his style. Probably worth a passing mention is that one of many people WebHamster has managed to annoy is Yiwentang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), currently indef-blocked for sock-puppetry. Ben Aveling
It might be but there are other possibles (including myself) who WebHammster has had issues with. Untill a greater analysis has been carried out (by checking all IPs (regardless of who they are) relating to WeBHammsters actions over the last week or so) I don't think we can apportion blame (after all there are a lot of reasons this could have occured). All that I think we can say is that some one somewhere is not playing the game. Slatersteven (talk) 22:43, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.}}    Requested by Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk endorsed MuZemike 04:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So is anyone going to actualy do it? by the way if i can i wish to endorse it too.Slatersteven (talk) 13:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Be patient. It'll get done. Checkusers have a life, too. MuZemike 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Hmm... looks like whoever's behind Wolof359 may also have been behind Free Hans (as opposed to Frei Hans). Benmols2 is  Confirmed for Oliviateacher (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Nicole 50dc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki),  Likely match for Yiwentang (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). – Luna Santin (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions

 Clerk note: Tagged. — Jake Wartenberg 21:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Tags all fixed; accounts blocked by PeterSymonds. NW (Talk) 22:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date August 12 2009, 00:06 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here)

Same troll trying to make others look bad. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I do not think it is necessarily someone who wants to make Noloop look bad, but rather Noloop himself. Pantherskin (talk) 12:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Noloop isn't stupid. He/she wouldn't make it so clear, just like others. And what would a sock of Noloop want Noloop topic banned?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 13:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well (playing devils advocate) if you want to create an account for attacks but wish to draw attnetion awat from you that would be the way to do it. that is why I belive all parties involved in dispute (including Noloop) need to be checked.Slatersteven (talk) 13:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well don't put it in the sockpuppet area. Tell the checkuser in the user area. Making Noloop an "Accused" sock is going to help much.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 13:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, back to the real reason I submitted this. User:Free Hans is a clear troll trying to make another user, User Frei Hans look bad by making it look like Frei Hans was socking.[[1]] I forgot to get diffs, so just a sec.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 19:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then the user whose name begins with Man (I didn't want to write the whole name out) edits this as his third edit. [[2]].Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 19:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cutting to the chase, notice the similarity between these edits? Transportation=[[3]], Man=[[4]], and Noloop= [[5]] Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 20:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 00:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk endorsed MuZemike 14:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
  • What this case needs to move forward is actual evidence linking the listed accounts to eachother, in the form of diffs. Please don't rely on folks reviewing contribs of posted accounts to notice what you noticed - make it obvious for us. Thanks, Nathan T 18:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Free_Hans/Archive&oldid=1140264290"