Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westernesste
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by SheepLinterBot (talk | contribs) at 15:24, 20 February 2023 (→[[Westernesste]]: [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Westernesste[edit]
- Westernesste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am also nominating the following related page because the notability of each seems to depend largely on the other:
Article about a religious organisation of uncertain size and no claimed notability. A Google search reveals nothing except the organisation's own website and those of its offshoots. No third party sources. The linked BLP at Maerian Morris may also be a candidate for discussion; there is only one reliable source there and it is unclear whether Morris is explicitly mentioned there (no page number is given) or whether the reference is simply to the better known Church of All Worlds. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 18:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalkstalk 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. For the orignisation, there is simply no coverage in reliable sources. For Maerian Morris, there is no substantia coverage although I found some mention of her confirming her as editor of Green Egg, but these are mentions and not coverage. AS for the list of references in the Morris article, all save one would not pass muster as a reliable source. The Adler book is a reliable source, but it appears to be only there to reference to the Church of All Worlds. A later edition is previewable in Google Books. Given that the cited edition is the one from 1987, and Morris, according to the article, did not become an editor of Green egg until 1993, it's highly unlikely there is any mention of Morris in that edition. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.