User talk:Arabiapowaa

February 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Arabiapowaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is orwellian. I do constructive suggestions on a discussion page of a page that has been clearly weaponized and the message is erased. How a contribution to a discussion page could justify this behavior ? From what I see several accounts and numerous contributions have been dealt with the same way although it was established they were not Sockpuppets. Have you even tried to check the sources and understant what is actually contentious on the page before savagely intervening ? Arabiapowaa (talk) 01:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=this is orwellian. I do constructive  suggestions on a discussion page of a page that has been clearly weaponized and the message is erased. How a contribution to a discussion page could justify this behavior ? From what I see several accounts and numerous contributions have been dealt with the same way although it was established they were not Sockpuppets. Have you even tried to check the sources and understant  what is actually contentious on the page before savagely intervening ? [[User:Arabiapowaa|Arabiapowaa]] ([[User talk:Arabiapowaa#top|talk]]) 01:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is orwellian. I do constructive  suggestions on a discussion page of a page that has been clearly weaponized and the message is erased. How a contribution to a discussion page could justify this behavior ? From what I see several accounts and numerous contributions have been dealt with the same way although it was established they were not Sockpuppets. Have you even tried to check the sources and understant  what is actually contentious on the page before savagely intervening ? [[User:Arabiapowaa|Arabiapowaa]] ([[User talk:Arabiapowaa#top|talk]]) 01:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is orwellian. I do constructive  suggestions on a discussion page of a page that has been clearly weaponized and the message is erased. How a contribution to a discussion page could justify this behavior ? From what I see several accounts and numerous contributions have been dealt with the same way although it was established they were not Sockpuppets. Have you even tried to check the sources and understant  what is actually contentious on the page before savagely intervening ? [[User:Arabiapowaa|Arabiapowaa]] ([[User talk:Arabiapowaa#top|talk]]) 01:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

PS: rhe discussion page mentioned is the one of [Juan Branco]. Arabiapowaa (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]