User talk:Likask

Welcome!

Hello, Likask, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MoFEM JosePH, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Salih (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MoFEM JosePH

The article MoFEM JosePH has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salih (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have added some sections to this article, I hope that this will give evidence of notability. As well I could add several peer reviewed journal papers where mofem was used, however I don't know if is necessary to mention them in order to improve notability. Pleas let me know, what you expect to see, in particular to remove issue of notability. Likask (talk) 10:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would include the journal papers, they're normally a major help in demonstrating the notability of articles like this. Nick (talk) 12:18, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

After including journal papers, should I remove \{\{proposed deletion/dated\}\} notice by myself, or it should be done by someone other more trusted Likask (talk) 12:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove the proposal deletion template yourself, but add a bit of text explaining why in the edit summary. Nick (talk) 13:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, On the basis of introduced changes, I am allowed to remove notability template? Does article satisfy necessary criteria? Kind regards, Likask.