Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robyndahiya (talk | contribs) at 04:09, 28 February 2023 (Requesting protection for Dahiya Khap). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts
Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Funimation

Reason: Here, an IP has added a class of very rare altered edits, it says in the summary of edits that included photos of the corporate offices and asked a class of questions on the discussion page of another IP about why the Crunchyroll website (the streaming service) was removed from both the infobox and external links when mixing with numerous competitors (section below) since it merged in mid-March 2022, almost barely a year since it began to consolidate into Crunchyroll itself. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Wut? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question: And why do you want the page protected? Lectonar (talk) 14:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For this, it has partially reverted to the old edition to be able to migrate the bit of history from the Crunchyroll article, the recently merged streaming service and now it sounds confusing to me that it has the same owner with Sony if instead Funimation is still owned by Sony Corporation of America with a joint venture with Sony Pictures Television and Aniplex's Japanese subsidiary in the United States also owned by Sony. And it gets confused by placing the Crunchyroll website both in the infobox and external links. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone cross-eyed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And have you protected the page yet? 179.52.223.99 (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you want your edits protected and your edits are being reverted by @FilmandTVFan28:. So maybe this is a content dispute and needs discussion on the talk page. I will defer to @Lectonar: or another RfPP reviewer, but I do not see the need. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just replied on my discussion page to the user here It is that I did not disrupt the edition on the Funimation page, in fact, I restored this confusion of Sony and Sony Pictures properties instead of saying that this is the current owner of Sony Pictures Television since 2017. Not Crunchyroll which is currently owned by Sony Group Corporation and Sony Pictures are different things. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted this edit. I already archived the links. CastJared (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But I don't see this change to the point where I restore this confusion. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Or yet. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tree Fu Tom

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2A00:23A8:D46:8601:1D54:CF2F:867B:B133 (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Now this is odd. The only edits from today are from the requester and they are highly suspect -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asuka (wrestler)

Temporary semi-protection: Unhelpful edits by IP users while there is a open discussion about the disputed content on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Elimination Chamber as an accomplishment. Mann Mann (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I EW warned the one from today. They seem intent on a block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory

Reason: In response to recent reports from the US intel community, the talk page has seen increased IP disruption. This includes sarcastic WP:POINTy comments, like [1] and [2]. While Talk protection is rare, requesting a temporary semi-protection or similar of the page to limit the disruption on what's already a difficult and contentious topic covered under sanctions, until the topic of the day moves on. Bakkster Man (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Home Alone 3

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing going back serval months, an IP user keeps changing the film's writing credits in the infobox without providing any reliable source. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tamara Lich

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, allegations of criminality (BLP violations) for this controversial and polarising subject. CT55555(talk) 03:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khanda, Sonipat

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dahiya Khap

Reason: to prevent vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&oldid=1142032335"