Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croxton Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Master of Puppets - _{Call me MoP! :D} 05:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croxton Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Good-faith search turned up no signs of notability for this record label. No notable artists or releases on the label. Unreferenced for nearly 3 years Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All I can find are trivial mentions. ^TheWeak_Willed 21:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete to Mick Thomas and Nick Corr. Small independent label, notable through proprietors, particularly Thomas.[1], [2] florrie 03:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMed^talk _stalk 21:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:CORP. No stand alone notability, there is already a passing mention in the Mick Thomas article. Nothing to merge due to the lack of coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.