Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldee
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:55, 3 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete. However, RadioFan's challenge to the reliability of the sources is a very strong one, and I would hope to see a more thorough discussion of that issue if this article is brought back to AfD in future. NAC—S Marshall Talk/Cont 22:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Eldee[edit]
- Eldee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
contested prod, lacks notability, lacks significant coverage in 3rd party reliable sources. Largely promotional article. RadioFan (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google search result for Eldee "Lanre Dabiri". There are several independent sources (e.g. [1],[2],[3]) sufficient for inclusion. Article needs to rewrite. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment existing of Google hits doesn't guarantee notability. The reliability of these sources is not clear. They appear to be self published.--RadioFan (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep due sources such as these: [4], [5], [6] & [7]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snorre (talk • contribs) 22:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yanno, that latter one is not going to work, as it's a duplicate of the page here on WP - but those last three might just do it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:49, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.