Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Since 10.28.2010/Archive
Since 10.28.2010
- Since 10.28.2010 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
31 July 2011
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
1, 2 and 3. In view of the aforementioned editor being BLOCKED INDEF currently, I'm going to respectfully request to check for other BLOCK EVASION sleepers, thank you. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 15:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I have added two more IP's that he has used to evade blocks in the past. Ryan Vesey Review me! 15:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment (ec'd, but never mind, I've added info on the other 2 ips after the ec),
- There have been no edits by the IP since the block at 10:22 31 July;
- I see no attempt to deceive here; just a user blocked for various competence-related concerns, who also edited as an IP - but openly declaring who it was e.g. edit-summary please don't revert, this is Since 10.28.2010 [1].
- 71.146.19.240 (talk · contribs) last edited at 07:03 31 July.
- 71.146.31.102 (talk · contribs) last edited in June
- 71.146.21.180 (talk · contribs) last edited 4 July
- I see no need for an SPI. All three IPs have obviously been used by the same person, but I can't see any evidence of nefarious socking. Chzz ► 15:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Clerk note: CU won't connect an account to IPs. Aside from the first IP listed, the other two are stale, so blocking them wouldn't help much. I don't see a reason to check for sleeper accounts, and we can't really do an IP sleeper check. As such, I'm closing. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
