Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabareesh Prabhaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sabareesh Prabhaker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think he meets notability criteria for musicians, but it isn't my field. The BBC recording seems to be a link to its music on a local BBC site. DGG ( talk ) 21:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep the two news sources in the article appear to be detailed profiles from major newspapers that are quite reliable [1] [2]. I don't have the ability to dig for more Indian-language sources, and it is likely that some exist. I will post at INB to see if anybody else is able. Vanamonde (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the source article in thehindu.com seems enough to meet the General Notability Guideline if anything else exists, and the volume of results in a simple name search is large enough to make it very unlikely that suitable references in languages other than English aren't numerous. BoyRD (talk) 03:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:55, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per sources, per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It has sufficient sources to establish notability. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 11:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.