Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snurgly
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:01, 16 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:01, 16 March 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism, slang with very few ghits in this context. Prod removed without comment--Porturology 06:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP is not a dictionary. (aeropagitica) 07:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Soon, before the vfd process hits a snurgly.--KJPurscell 08:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dicdef. --Terence Ong 10:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Feezo (Talk) 10:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism or babytalk-dictdef at best. --Lockley 18:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:NOT. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 21:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.