Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Is Emo
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 09:53, 24 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:53, 24 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable podcast. No references or sources. Also seems more an episode guide than an encyclopedia article. Miremare 17:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Podcasts need to have outside sources. Speciate 22:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cut it errr... It gets a few mentions in reliable sources, but not there does not really appear to be enough material to do a decent article on it. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 23:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of coverage from significant sources Corpx 07:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is notable, I guarantee it. If I have a chance this weekend, I'll prove it with some sources and come back with a keep vote to back my statement up. Commenting only to attempt to avoid a speedy WP:SNOW delete + close... spazure (contribs) 07:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentI'd like to say keep a cut down version, but no outside reliable sources have really shown this to be notable. If noone comes up with any external sources (i.e. news coverage) than count this as delete.--ZayZayEM 03:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.