Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigitte Secard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brigitte Secard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite her admirable efforts beginning at the age of 8 to solve human suffering, Secard seems to have almost entirely avoided receiving in-depth coverage to meet GNG, with the possible exception of one article in an iffy paper that seems to have ceased publication by 2008. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I cast a large net for sources on EBSCO, Newsbank, and Newspapers.com. She comes up in a number of passing US newspaper mentions as "She's hosting a book signing" with zero commentary about herself, basically just advertisements for her appearances. She also appears as a passing mention in this article about how she lobbied the local arts district in her town to paint some stairs ([1]). A clear !delete. Nomader (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any sources other than those already discussed. (Which is a shame, because I really wanted to find out what she hoped to accomplish with the lions.) Sojourner in the earth (talk) 15:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promo. Large blocks of unsourced text and flowery wording, I can't find much of anything about this individual. The name is too common to find anything for her alone. Oaktree b (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since the text is nothing more than a promotional piece of work, with a sprinkle of vanity prose. Whence notability? Nowhere. It certainly does not grow in monoculture trees. -The Gnome (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.