Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hennekam Koss de Geest syndrome
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:57, 8 April 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 00:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hennekam Koss de Geest syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's no evidence that this is a genuine syndrome; OrphaNet lists it but says nothing about it.[1]. We can't have an article about every single case report ever, especially a 20-year-old report that's never been cited:[2] Fences&Windows 15:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 15:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't seem verifiable. Mrmewe (talk) 15:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's "the name someone gave to the syndrome"? Great. I did find list-type mentions here and here, but this doesn't seem like a notable, recognized medical syndrome. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.