Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil Ziade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎ . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil Ziade[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to WP:GNG and WP:BIO clearly. Source #1 and #3 not working. Source #2 his website conflict of interests. Sources from #4 to #12 are unreliable and looks like paid sources. Page creator appears to have a conflict of interest with the article. فيصل (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Lebanon. فيصل (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Source #1 and #3 not working, but have archive links in the citations so we can still check them. I found an English-language source by clicking on the Google News link above: an American magazine called Nevada Business published an article called Family Owned Businesses 2018 on 1 March 2018. It has a paragraph on Growth Holdings (along with paragraphs on other similar size businesses such as a piercing salon, and a restaurant and bar). The magazine article seems to suggest that his brother Philippe is more likely to be notable than Khalil.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 08:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG and I could not find any notable sources. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.