User talk:Mkevlar

If we stay silent on an issue consider it consent!

I am helping to build a consensus for city statistics, indexes and indicator usage for cities. My engagement in civil in municipal, Provincial, Federal governments has given me insight that can be shared with the wiki community.

Your edit of Toronto article

Hi Mkevlar, I reverted your good-faith edit of the lead section of the Toronto article. On the Toronto talk page, and also in this discussion, there is a consensus to not include city ranking trivia in the lead section or in other sections of city articles. Perhaps there is an alternate way that you can include the information elsewhere in the Toronto article in a different format other than a city ranking statement? Thanks, JPark99 (talk) 06:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with JPark99 we should find another way to do bring it in. Thx TheKevlar 21:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abbotsford, British Columbia

I notice you added this edit to Abbotsford, British Columbia. I checked one of the sources you cited here and wasn't able to find any mention of Abbotsford. Am I missing something? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your lack of response is a response. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source is notable to The City of Abbotsford. They are actively participating in this urban study. I will give this page some time to comment than add it back in.TheKevlar 16:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

The source reference link you are referring to was an unintentionally cut/paste artifact used by other cities that are mentioned in it. The other reference link is a city landing page with a spreadsheet link to the underlying sources [User:Mkevlar|Mkevlar]] 02:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

This doesn't make a bit of sense. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extract, transform, load, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stakeholder. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you review my article?

Hi there, in the creation of a new article (Anti-Waste and Circular Economy Law) I researched other relevant Wikipedia articles to link to and found your edits and peer review suggestions on the Ecolabel article extremely helpful. Would you be willing to take a look at my article if you have the time? Thank you! Nustudent1120 (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The lead paragraph should describe the topic generally and not start out with Frances implementation.

* Pluralize the word "law" to "laws" in the title.

* France is an instance of the law so give France their own section and subsections.

* Canada also has a law against single use plastics that needs to be includes.

* Lookin ahead is speculative so remove it

* Rather than providing commentary on article groups condense it by functionality that way other Anti-Waste laws will fit in much easier.

If all this is done then I would be convinced the article should be published TheKevlar (talk) 22:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]