Jump to content

User talk:WarmFairy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WarmFairy (talk | contribs) at 23:50, 25 April 2023 (→Appealing ColdFairy's lock: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Block evasion

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyobons mots 20:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WarmFairy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you are a Wikimedia steward or have a close connection with one, please ask them to remove the global lock on User:ColdFairy (talk). There were no disciplinary issues with ColdFairy. On this account, I thought it would be a clear-cut case because of the above reasoning. However, I now recognize it's not. Once ColdFairy is unblocked, please unblock this account so I can use it as a legitamite alternate acccount. Please don't decline this one unless the Wikimedia stewards decide to maintain ColdFairy's global lock. Thanks! WarmFairy (talk) 22:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a legitimate use of the unblock template. PhilKnight (talk) 02:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WarmFairy (talk) 22:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight is there any chance you can get in touch with the Wikimedia stewards to unblock ColdFairy? If you don't have a close connection with a steward, could you please ask other admins if they know any stewards well (or they themselves are a steward). My unblock "request" was just to get attention to correct this injustice against ColdFairy WarmFairy (talk) 04:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You need to appeal the lock of your main account using the instructions at Global locks.-- Ponyobons mots 22:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already sent the stewards an e-mail. It's just taking a long time, which is annoying. If you or any other admin are a steward or have close connnections with one, please bring this case before them. WarmFairy (talk) 22:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo do you agree with my proposal that if my main account is unlocked, this account should also be unblocked so I can use it as a legitamite alternate account? WarmFairy (talk) 22:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On the talk page, it was stated that I was on LTA. I checked WP:LTA and neither this account nor my main one is on that list. WarmFairy (talk) 22:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing ColdFairy's lock

I just e-mailed User:AmandaNP, the steward who globally locked my main account, User:ColdFairy. If you know her personally, please bring ColdFairy's global lock to her attention. WarmFairy (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask User:AmandaNP to review the global lock she placed onto my main account User:ColdFairy. Please don't decline this block unless the Wikimedia Foundation concludes that the global lock on ColdFairy is justified. I e-mailed both the Wikimedia stewards and AmandaNP directly. It has been over a day since the e-mail to the stewards, yet there has been no response. I believe this is the only way I have for AmandaNP or another steward to review ColdFairy's global lock. If you decline before the review occurs, please give me information on how to speed up the long waittime. WarmFairy (talk) 23:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

WarmFairy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is there any way I can speed up the process or should I wait? If I should wait, how long should I expect the proccess to take?
  • Also, is there another way I can ask administrators questions from this account and get a timely response without having to use this request?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Is there any way I can speed up the process or should I wait? If I should wait, how long should I expect the proccess to take? *::Also, is there another way I can ask administrators questions from this account and get a timely response without having to use this request? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Is there any way I can speed up the process or should I wait? If I should wait, how long should I expect the proccess to take? *::Also, is there another way I can ask administrators questions from this account and get a timely response without having to use this request? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Is there any way I can speed up the process or should I wait? If I should wait, how long should I expect the proccess to take? *::Also, is there another way I can ask administrators questions from this account and get a timely response without having to use this request? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

WarmFairy (talk) 23:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WarmFairy&oldid=1151741105"