Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten mile wide tornado
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ten mile wide tornado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, disambiguates tornadoes whose widths are likely errors (see footnotes on List of United States tornadoes in 1946, and the respective talk page. 38.108.217.140 (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Science, Environment, United States of America, Colorado, Kansas, and Montana. Primefac (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Procedural nomination, see Special:PermaLink/1152482019#Ten_mile_wide_tornado. Primefac (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, an adequate ambig. page. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — As the person who contested the PROD, it is a perfectly allowed disambiguation page. Slight comment as well, user proposing deletion did not discuss whatsoever on talk page discussion I made about why I contested the PROD. This is actually a duplicate reason to the PROD, which was “
Disambig page for a probable error (see Talk:List of United States tornadoes in 1946
”. So this AfD is an undiscussed second attempt at deletion with the same reason. Sad. Elijahandskip (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC) - Neutral On one hand, only the USWB covers anything relating to a ten mile wide tornado, failing WP:GNG (significant coverage by independent reliable sources). However, disambiguation pages aren't usually subjected to WP:GNG. Infinity (talk - contributions) 17:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Insignificant coverage by independent reliable sources. Longevitydude (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2023 (UTC)