Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unified Code Count

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Source lines of code. History is thereunder for selective merge. Star Mississippi 01:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Unified Code Count

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Unified Code Count (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed for deletion as Non-notable software. No evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. Tagged for notability for a decade. PROD was declined due to a prior REFUND at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 81#Unified Code Count (UCC), but no party has done anything to address the lack of sourcing. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

• Merge extremely selectively to Source lines of code. This was important work and is still in use by the US Department of Defense. However there is almost no independent material available for a separate article. As a note about the earlier days of Wikipedia, one of the papers on the project reports:

A Wikipedia® [6] page was set up for the UCC as a structured software environment to record and present project information to the software community. This wiki is periodically updated by student teams at USC.

StarryGrandma (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

"periodically updated" in this case appears to have only lasted until 2011. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.