User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

World-Fashion

Hi Mr Ollie, I want to add some valuable lines inside this article which will be very valuable to your website readers and help them to provide some valuable information, don't you want that? Mushii56 (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

"Milan Fashion Week" I would like to add some of my valuable lines in this article and give my link. Mushii56 (talk) 20:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place to promote your website. If you keep attempting to add it you can expect that your account will be blocked and/or your site will be added to Wikipedia's spam blacklist. Spam additions are not 'valuable'. - MrOllie (talk) 20:29, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm not recommending my own site, I just want to put some of my information on it And if you readers like my information, how can they get more information, that's why I wanted to add a link to my site. Mushii56 (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

I just want to give my reference here Mushii56 (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

It is not my intention to spam Wikipedia at all Mushii56 (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

If you don't want to spam Wikipedia, simply do not add the external link again. MrOllie (talk) 20:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

So what kind of link will Wikipedia accept? Mushii56 (talk) 20:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia will not accept any form of link to your website. MrOllie (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

So what are the links I see within this article? Mushii56 (talk) 20:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

They meet our sourcing requirements. Your website does not. MrOllie (talk) 20:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

These are the guidelines I want to know from you, my friend. Mushii56 (talk) 20:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

And how can I convey my information to your people through this article Mushii56 (talk) 20:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm not going to debate Wikipedia sourcing with you. You have been warned what will happen if you continue to add the link. MrOllie (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

ok Mushii56 (talk) 20:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

replay mushiii 2806:262:3404:145D:4D18:7ED4:A61B:42A4 (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Better Access Scheme

My edit is correct. The current rebate amount is $131.65 not the current lower value stated in the article.

Better Access Scheme: Revision history - Wikipedia Kuvesh (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

My edit is correct. The motivation for other groups to lobby for the title psychologists is so they can access the Medicare rebates which are currently only applicable to AHPRA registered psychologists.

Psychologist: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Kuvesh (talk) 12:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Just stop adding spam links. Thanks. - MrOllie (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Women In STEM fields

Hi, please can you explain what was wrong with the links I added? STEM Women is a globally recognised organisation which works to address the underrepresentation of women in STEM and should therefore be listed under 'organized efforts'. Was there something wrong with the format of the link?

The STEM Women whitepaper is a fully researched annual publication which is utilised throughout STEM industries and higher education and is therefore a recognised publication. I'd be really grateful if you could explain how these links can be added. thanks. Universitiesstemwomen (talk) 11:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place to promote your organization (even if it is a good cause), nor is it a place to list self published sources such as whitepapers (even if they are well researched). Please have a look at WP:NOTADVOCACY, WP:COI, and WP:ELNO. MrOllie (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, so does the link have to be added by someone else? Or does it need to be a link from a different site?

I don't understand how other (smaller and less-established) organisations have been added in this capacity? I will have a loo at these links but if you could explain how it is possible to add STEM Women as a link that would be really helpful. Universitiesstemwomen (talk) 12:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Just to add, I do think that this would appear in an encyclopaedia under 'Women In STEM - organised efforts' as it is exactly that, and similar organisations are linked here. Universitiesstemwomen (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

The link is not appropriate for Wikipedia, it should not be added at all - not by you, and not by anyone else. MrOllie (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

List of Sudbury Schools

I noticed that you reverted the addition of the Boulder Sudbury School to this page. Do you have a reason for this? Also, there are many other Sudbury schools that need to be added for this page to be useful. Dualunity (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

As already explained on your own talk page, that is a list of schools with preexisting Wikipedia articles. MrOllie (talk) 17:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

The Boulder Sudbury School and many other schools that were previously listed on this page, long before any mention of "notable". The very idea of you gatekeeping this page is antithetical to the Sudbury model itself, which has no central authority, no certifying body, and has numerous manifestations appearing in different cultures around the world and can still call themselves Sudbury schools. Dualunity (talk) 18:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Some amount of 'gatekeeping', as you call it, is necessary to keep the page in compliance with Wikipedia's policies. For example, we're not in the business of hosting directories of external links. MrOllie (talk) 18:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Gerdau Graphene

Can you please explain your rationale for marking Gerdau Graphene for speedy deletion? The contributions that the company has made to the graphene industry are both significant and noteworthy, evidenced by the independent editorial coverage about it. AaronEndre (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

It was obvious advertising. As a paid editor, you should not have created it in the article mainspace. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID carefully, and use the WP:AFC process next time. MrOllie (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Notes on the Ease of Using Cavalier Axonometric Projections

we can know what is the logical reason that led you to delete the following part:

Notes on the Ease of Using Cavalier Axonometric Projections

Due to the ease of execution of axonometric drawings compared to perspective drawings, it makes sense to use the simpler types of axonometric projections, such as cavalier and cabinet. In cavalier projection, the projections of shapes belonging to horizontal planes remain in their true form, while the projections of shapes belonging to other planes get distorted. However, the measurements of vertical lines (parallel to the z-axis) can remain equal to their true measurements when the projection center direction is 45 degrees relative to the plane of projection. Similarly, in cabinet projection, the shapes belonging to the zx or (yz) plane are drawn in their true form, and the measurements of lines parallel to the x or y-axis can also remain without distortion.

The simpler types of axonometric projections: plan oblique and elevation oblique

It's important to note that all types of axonometric projections are not an exact representation of reality and cannot replace perspective drawings. However, they are a useful tool for architects and engineers to show three-dimensional configurations in a clear and quick way. Hasanisawi (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)