User talk:MrOllie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:MrOllie)
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Banc De Binary[edit]

Hi, please do not add unverifiable facts to the page. Thank you. --Tianderni (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, MrOllie. You have new messages at Tianderni's talk page.
Message added 17:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tianderni (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Pages of Cloud Computings[edit]

Hi there !

Hope you are doing great :)

I'm thinking about characteristics of cloud management platform related stuff and accidentally found that website when i desperately needed to compare some cloud management platform

i have checked the web site page and its really an useful as a internet researcher .

That page defines the characteristics of all giant cloud computing providers as a open source community so it would be great to thank them

Also check the ref where i have added is "Enterprises with large-scale cloud implementations may require more robust cloud management tools which include specific characteristics[8]"

So if you go the ref link , you will find there are something that direct related to Wikipedia page . Or we may add External Link Section to that page ? I am really sorry if i am doing something wrong , pardon a poor wiki girl . — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 20:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC) (talk) 20:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

That website bills itself as a promotional vehicle for IT consultants and vendors. Our sourcing guidelines require indepednent sources with a reputation for fact checking. I don't think this site belongs on Wikipedia, either as a source or as an external link. - MrOllie (talk) 20:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Another Request[edit]

I know but what about the page which exist ? the page( i have linked is provide all the information in free for google users . check and compare the lists of products.... they wont charges for the checking information . Yes they are IT consultant for the heavy users only who need a very much detailed report and regarding the vendors they crowdsource all the vendors information from them and place onto one place . the author who write the content are itself associated with C-class executive of giant company .

I am sorry if you felt so but i am not affiliated with that sites but those people are really worth to have as at least on external links .

let me know what you think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 20:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Retrocomputing External Link[edit]

Good day. You removed an external link for the Commodore Computer Club from the Retrocomputing page saying it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. After reading the Wikipedia External links page to educate myself, under the section "what to link" the 3 bullet points do apply to the link and decription I added:

1. Is the site content accessible to the reader?

Yes, the site is Section 508 compliant.

2. Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)?

Yes, the site is useful, tasteful, informative and factual.

3. Is the link functioning and likely to remain functional?

Yes, the site has been functioning since April 2010 and will remain functional.

Thank you for your time and understanding

LL2000LL (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

You seem to have missed 'Links normally to be avoided' point 11, Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites. - MrOllie (talk) 16:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Fractal Rainbow ebook[edit]

I understand that this Book is very interesting to understand better Scale Relativity.

It is a disclosure book that explain and show very easy why Scale Factor and Fractal Theory will be the future in Cosmology in a very easy way.

There are very few books about Scale Relativity (2 from Nottale) and no own easy to understand for General Readers.

Please, read it and after ward you can decide ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dapifo (talkcontribs) 19:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

We don't externally link bookstores. Even if we did, we don't cite and/or link to self published books, generally. - MrOllie (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Comparison of TLS implementations[edit]

Hello. I didn't want to promote anything. I just added TLSe because is the only implementation in the public domain (so what am I advertising ?). Just like adding S2n in the comparison page would be a good idea. Anyway, is fine. (talk) 18:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

We generally do not have entries on lists or comparison pages if there is no corresponding Wikipedia article - in particular, such lists should not include external links. - MrOllie (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
So it should be fine if I create the TLSe wiki page? (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
If you have multiple, independent sources that meet our sourcing guidelines. - MrOllie (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)