Wikipedia talk:Wikibreak
![]() | Essays High‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Department of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance | |||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Humorous content
Dear user @Praxidicae: (and everyone else) Sorry for reverting that edit, but i think that without these, the page isn't humorous. Except if we want to not to make this humorous, i believe these can stay. What is your opinion? Enivak (talk) 19:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Taking a break from specific article(s)
When you are temporarily taking a break from specific article(s) due to annoyance about certain things, or to calm down after a consensus was reached you didn't agree with, but still editing articles generally on Wikipedia, is that still called a wikibreak? I know we have the term "semi-wikibreak" but it's not clear from the page if that's referring to the same thing. I think a semi-wikibreak might just mean you're spending less time on Wikipedia than before, not that you have consciously decided to pause editing specific article(s). Is there a term for that? Kidburla (talk) 08:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Wikibreak for IP users?
How can an IP user (like me) announce a wikibreak. IP users cannot edit user pages, so how will I, 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:DC70:AC4A:4821:E057, announce a wikibreak. If anyone finds a solution, put it on this page. WikiBreak would greatly improve if we find a solution. I might be going on a wikibreak. 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:DC70:AC4A:4821:E057 (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Announcing a wikibreak is sometimes done by regular editors to let others know not to expect a reply from a notice or talk page post during the break; or just to let others know why they haven't edited in a while. It can be helpful for others, but it's an optional courtesy and not required. To answer your question, the IP user talk page seems like the logical place, but usually it's not necessary or even helpful for an unregistered editor to make such an announcement. Generally it's probably not a good idea because many IPs are dynamic and shared among multiple users. It could be confusing and doing so would be a net negative if the unregistered editor moves to a different IP and the notice is left behind indefinitely. --DB1729talk 12:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok then. I, in fact, am an example of dynamic IPS, I also control
2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:DC70:AC4A:4821:E057, 101.185.66.160 (IPv4 addr.), 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:689E:D8CE:BF9F:1917 (other IPv6)
- I probably won’t go on a wiki break. 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:9541:78E9:CB4:9EE4 (talk) 06:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok then. I, in fact, am an example of dynamic IPS, I also control
"Wikipedia:RFZ" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Wikipedia:RFZ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 4 § Wikipedia:RFZ until a consensus is reached. Q𝟤𝟪 09:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)