WP:ARC

Requests for arbitration

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam		10 June 2023	0/0/0

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Venezuelan politics	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	20 Apr 2024	04 May 2024
~~Mzajac~~	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	—	Case suspended

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Conflict of interest management	13 Apr 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing	none	(orig. case)	30 April 2024

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Shortcuts

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

This page is for statements, not discussion.

If you must reply to another user's statement, do so in your own section (more information).
Your section must not contain more than 500 words (Word Count Tool; internal gadget). This includes your replies to other users. To request an extension, either make the request in your statement section or email the clerks email list.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, eg off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam

Initiated by Cossde (talk) at 16:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Cossde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
Oz346 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Petextrodon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by Cossde

Oz346 removed [1] cited content attributed to the FBI stating that "One U.S. state agency has already been cited. Undue weight to focus on multiple agencies of the same state. Additionally this notice focus isn’t on humane rights violations but counterterrorism". Thereafter Oz346 and Petextrodon has repeatedly removed this content citing various wiki rules such as WP:NPOV and factual inacuaraises, spotty reach, properganda, at times conterdicting eachother. The comments/anaylsis in question is directly attributed to the FBI and shared from its own website [2], which has then been refered to by other RS such as the Times of India [3] and the Hindu [4] newspapers. My attempts to relocated this content to a suitable section has been met by stiff resistance and swfit removal of content. Therefore, I kindly request 3rd party arbitration to help settle this matter. Thank you. Cossde (talk) 16:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Oz346

Statement by Petextrodon

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Removal of citited content on Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Removal of citited content on Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)