Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh Pratidin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bangladesh Pratidin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage WP:SIG; Doesn't meet WP:GNG; Considerd WP:BEFORE M.parvage (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Organizations, Business, and Bangladesh. M.parvage (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I considered WP:BEFORE; But I encourage contributors to do a search on it before giving an opinion. I also did a source analysis.
Source assessment table: prepared by User:m.parvage
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source 1 |  Own website; see WP:IIS
|
? | doesn't matter
|
✘ No |
| Source 2 | Own website
|
? | self promotion
|
✘ No |
| Source 3 | Not at all
|
|
content is just about a refernece
|
✘ No |
| Source 4 | promotional content
|
|
No significant coverage, WP:SIGCOV; Just a PR content
|
✘ No |
| Source 5 |
|
|
not pointing the subject in detail, doesn't satisfy WP:SIGCOV
|
✘ No |
| Source 6 | About an employee not the organization
|
? |
|
✘ No |
| Source 7 | No mention
|
? | No mention
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
M.parvage (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Table above shows that WP:GNG has not been met. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 11:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)