User talk:Enrico Manni

This is Enrico Manni's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sigal Music Museum (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Good so far but we need more independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sigal Music Museum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enrico Manni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! :-) Enrico Manni (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted again the page for creation. God bless you. Enrico Manni (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear that you're here for cross-wiki spamming and promotion. Your editing patttern is highly suspicious. Graham87 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits (especially to articles and random deletion discussions) are incredibly disruptive and any admin would have blocked you for those. To get unblocked, I would ask that at a minimum you declare any conflict of interest you have (see below). Graham87 06:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Enrico Manni. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Sigal Music Museum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Enrico Manni. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Enrico Manni|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Graham87 06:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to Davide Lo Surdo. Graham87 06:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid for edit the museum and for any other page. Enrico Manni (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why are you promoting them so strongly across several wikis? Graham87 16:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

for create pages that didn't exist before nd honestly i did not think it was bad thing

i apologize for creating a nuisance Enrico Manni (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Davide Lo Surdo, etc.. Thank you. Graham87 07:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]