Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeciv (2nd nomination)

Freeciv

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted a few months ago, still not seeing any new notability that's happened since the last AfD. This version of the game was anyway [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 14:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And here [2]. Multiple versions of the same article on wiki, this needs SALT. Oaktree b (talk) 15:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't believe that Freeciv is the same as FCIV.net, although they are related. The outcomes FCIV.net deletion discussions shouldn't affect this one. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 15:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, came to say the same thing. This article has been around since 2004. Haven't had time to check if it's notable or not yet, but the nomination should be revised to clear up this misunderstanding. Sergecross73 msg me 16:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the article has been around since 2001. Cardamon (talk) 05:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Come on... research. The prior AFD shows more than enough acceptable sourcing. Conflating different topics together, this AFD is just procedurally wrong. -- ferret (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources identified in the last AfD. FCIV.NET is another topic. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 21:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per my rationale in the previous AfD (see sources I listed there). Pavlor (talk) 05:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]