Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Fairhurst
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by WOSlinker (talk | contribs) at 12:03, 22 July 2023 (fix lint issues). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. kurykh 00:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nathan Fairhurst (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Young football player who has never played in a fully professional league, thus failing WP:ATHLETE. Prod removed without explanation by article's creator. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - though it needs more details, and perhaps a re-write, he has (according to the article itself) made an appearance for Wrexham, a professional football club, who play in The Football League, which is professional. He's therefore notable under WP:ATHLETE. - RD (Talk) 12:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems my football knowledge needs some work - Wrexham are now in the Conference Division, and therefore non-league. - RD (Talk) 12:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wrexham may be a professional club but they actually play in the Conference National, which is NOT a fully professional league. Seeing as he has only made one appearance for them, he fails WP:ATHLETE. Bettia (rawr!) 11:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. When and if he plays professionally, he can be re-added. -- Alexf(talk) 12:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Another 'not yet' player.--ClubOranjeTalk 23:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the nomination, not yet, not now. JBsupreme (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not just yet, at the moment he fails WP:ATHLETE. — neuro(talk) 06:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.