Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpsehump

Unsourced, non-notable neologism. Belongs in Wiktionary. Chevinki 01:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn neologism semper fictilis 01:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I'm not even sure it belongs in Wiktionary. — Pious7_Talk^Contribs 01:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Teabagging. FiggyBee 01:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced and pointless. Bridgeplayer 04:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. /Blaxthos 05:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete abject nonsense Guy (Help!) 14:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't belong here or in Wiktionary. Besides, it's called "skullfucking". Recury 14:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment why not just prod this thing? Hasn't been prodded before, nothing remotely controversial about this. --Xyzzyplugh 14:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Scienter 18:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and set the perps on fire. fails WP:NEO, WP:ATT. Christ on a crutch, who in the hell felt it necessary for there to be an encyclopedia article on this subject? RGTraynor 20:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree, whoever made this article should be stuffed into an oven! --Evergreens78 23:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete --Evergreens78 23:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]