Jump to content

Eucarpha strobilina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Fadesga (talk | contribs) at 15:24, 22 October 2023 (References). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Eucarpha strobilina
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Order: Proteales
Family: Proteaceae
Genus: Eucarpha
Species:
E. strobilina
Binomial name
Eucarpha strobilina
(Labill.) P.H.Weston & Mabb.[2]
Synonyms[2][3][4]
  • Embothrium strobilinum Labill.
  • Knightia integrifolia A.Cunn.
  • Knightia strobilina R.Br. (nom. inval.)
  • Knightia strobilina (Labill.) R.Br. ex Meisn.
  • Knightia strobilina (Labill.) Virot
  • Rymandra strobilina (Labill.) Kuntze

Eucarpha strobilina, synonym Knightia strobilina, is a species of flowering plant in the family Proteaceae, native to New Caledonia.[3]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The taxonomic history of the species is somewhat tangled, as some names have been used that were not formally published. The species was first described as Embothrium strobilinum by Jacques Labillardière in 1806.[5] In 1830, Robert Brown wrote that it seemed to belong to Knightia, but did not actually make the combination, so the name "Knightia strobilina R.Br." is invalid.[4][6] In 1856, Carl Meissner listed "K.? strobilina" under Knightia, referring to Brown, and excluded it from Embothrium;[7][8] the combination Knightia strobilina was also used in 1968.[9] Following Meissner, the species continued to be placed in Knightia until 1975, when Lawrence Johnson and Barbara G. Briggs recognized the distinctness of two New Caledonian species of Knightia, particularly their prominent bracts, and transferred both to Eucarpha,[10] a transfer supported in 2006.[11] The nomenclatural combination for the species in the genus Eucarpha was only published in 2022.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Amice, R., Bruy, D., Butin, J.-P., Cazé, H., Fleurot, D., Hequet, V., Lannuzel, G., Laudereau, C., Mandaoué, L. & Vandrot, H. 2021. Knightia strobilina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T113138400A198681898. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T113138400A198681898.en. Accessed on 17 July 2023.
  2. ^ a b c "Eucarpha strobilina (Labill.) P.H.Weston & Mabb.", The International Plant Names Index, retrieved 2022-04-30
  3. ^ a b "Knightia strobilina (Labill.) R.Br. ex Meisn.", Plants of the World Online, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, retrieved 2022-04-30
  4. ^ a b "Knightia strobilina R.Br.", The International Plant Names Index, retrieved 2022-05-01
  5. ^ "Embothrium strobilinum Labill.", The International Plant Names Index, retrieved 2022-05-01
  6. ^ Brown, Robert (1830), "Orites", Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae Supplementum Primum, pp. 31–32, retrieved 2022-05-01, p. 32: "Ad Knightiam pertinare videtur Embothrium strobilinum Labill." (Embothrium strobilinum Labill. seems to belong to Knightia)
  7. ^ "Knightia strobilina (Labill.) R.Br. ex Meisn.", The International Plant Names Index, retrieved 2022-05-01
  8. ^ Meissner, Carl Daniel Friedrich (1856), "XXXVII. Knightia; XXXVIII. Embothrium", in De Candolle, Alphonso P. (ed.), Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vol. 14, pp. 442–445, retrieved 2022-05-01
  9. ^ "Knightia strobilina (Labill.) Virot", The International Plant Names Index, retrieved 2022-05-01
  10. ^ Johnson, L.A.S.; Briggs, B.G. (1975), "On the Proteaceae: the evolution and classification of a southern family", Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Botany, 70 (2): 83–182, doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1975.tb01644.x
  11. ^ Weston, Peter H.; Barker, Nigel P. (2006), "A new suprageneric classification of the Proteaceae, with an annotated checklist of genera", Telopea, 11 (3): 314–344, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.567.9092, doi:10.7751/telopea20065733