User talk:Fadesga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Annals of Philosophy[edit]

Hi Fabio, this is user:Martin of Sheffield. I'm just about to revert your edit to the Annals and feel you deserve an explanation. The Annals was published at the start of the 19thC and uses the language of the period. It is about natural philosophy, not about what we today would call philosophy. Natural philosophy covered what we today would call science, with a good admixture of engineering and geography. For instance consider Thomson, Thomas, ed. (1814), Annals of Philosophy IV, Robert Baldwin, p. 232, retrieved 16 December 2014  which is discussing steam locomotives, not the finer points of ethics. For this reason I consider {{philosophy-journal-stub}} to be misleading to modern readers. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Tieta (telenovela)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Tieta (telenovela), Fadesga!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the under construction template.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Reference errors on 25 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Natural science journals[edit]

Hi, this new cat confuses me a bit. As far as I see, "Category:Natural science journals" is just a synonym of "Category:Scientific journals". What, if anything, is the difference? Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 07:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)