Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sphere Media

Sphere Media

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. References are PR, Press releases, typical PR churnalism. WP:ADMASQ. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Companies, and Canada. AllyD (talk) 07:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In light of Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines, I advocate for the retention of the article on Sphere Media. Below are the arguments substantiated by the criteria outlined in the guidelines:

1. Significant Coverage: Sphere Media has received significant coverage in reputable industry publications including Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, as demonstrated by the detailed mentions of its partnerships, awards, and notable productions. This coverage goes beyond trivial mentions, addressing Sphere Media directly and in detail, fulfilling the criteria of significant coverage.

2. Reliable Sources: The sources cited in the article are recognized and reputable within the media and entertainment industry, thereby meeting the criteria of reliable sources. The editorial integrity of Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, among others, allows for a verifiable evaluation of Sphere Media's notability.

3. Independence of Sources: The cited sources are independent of Sphere Media, not being produced by the company or individuals affiliated with it, aligning with the criteria that sources should be independent of the subject. This independence further substantiates the notability of Sphere Media as the coverage is not self-promotional or derived from press releases or other non-independent materials.

4. Secondary Sources: The article predominantly relies on secondary sources which provide an objective evidence of notability. These sources delve into the history, achievements, and operations of Sphere Media, thereby giving a well-rounded view of the subject without necessitating original research.

5. Multiple Sources: A variety of sources have been utilized to establish notability, not just relying on a single publication or author, in line with the guidelines that multiple sources are generally expected to establish notability.

6. Depth of Coverage: The coverage provided in the cited sources is extensive, discussing various aspects of Sphere Media, from its historical evolution to recent notable achievements and partnerships. This depth of coverage is indicative of the subject's notability, as it reflects a substantial level of attention and detail provided by independent, reliable sources.

7. Awards and Recognition: Sphere Media has been honored with significant awards like the Peabody Award, Canadian Screen Awards, and Banff World Media Festival awards, which are well-documented in reliable sources. These accolades further underline the notable contributions of Sphere Media to the media and entertainment industry.

8. Potential for Improvement: Even if the current state of the article may not meet Wikipedia's stringent standards, the notable nature of Sphere Media as demonstrated by the significant coverage in reliable and independent sources indicates a solid basis for the article's retention and improvement rather than deletion. According to Don't Include Criteria, if the topic is notable, efforts should be channeled towards cleaning up the article to meet Wikipedia's standards instead of opting for deletion.

In conclusion, the article on Sphere Media aptly satisfies the general notability guideline as stipulated by Wikipedia. The significant, reliable, and independent coverage across multiple secondary sources substantiates the notability of Sphere Media, warranting the maintenance and further improvement of this Wikipedia article. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 08:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]