You are going to leave a message in my talk page?: Go ahead (by clicking HERE) and do it but don't ping me (for the new-bies). Yeh, please be good enough to check back for my reply. I may not notify you always. Cheers!!

This is Benison's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49: 30 days

I love to see this when logging in!!

Welcome!

Hello, Benison, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

joseph mccarthy was disgraced, this is a fact that no one disputes

my edit was perfectly constructive. Everyone knows mccarthy was disgraced and was a disgrace. His own descendants certainly know it. He died a disgraced person. The article itself includes a dozen examples of his disgraceful conduct, and the Senate vote to censure is further evidence that this was the consensus opinion. mccarthy's disgrace is the lede headline of his life. Before his death, mccarthy himself knew he was a disgrace. he expressed his self-hatred through alcoholism and substance abuse. Ultimately, his own disgrace is, in effect, what killed him. An intro that misses this explicit point is itself unconstructive. 73.72.206.144 (talk) 19:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moonshine was film in Hubbards

https://www.saltwire.com/atlantic-canada/lifestyles/dont-get-on-the-bad-side-of-moonshines-family-in-hubbards-shot-cbc-comedy-100632700/ MMQ735 (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good. But the added information was uncited. Kindly add references from reliable sources. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/television/moonshine-creator-sheri-elwood-mines-nova-scotia-family-roots-for-cbc-dramedy/article_2ec1db33-9f1a-5fb0-9b8f-0f402c290516.html https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-making-my-tv-show-in-nova-scotia-put-the-ideas-of-homecoming-and-the/ https://www.hubbardsbeach.com/home-of-the-real-moonshine MMQ735 (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add them to the article. Not here on my talk page. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dangerous Girl" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dangerous Girl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Dangerous Girl until a consensus is reached. 67.70.25.175 (talk) 11:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Byshek

Hello! You asked me for more quotes for the battle of Byshek. I gave 4 visible sources, I think they will be sufficient, why do you think they are inadequate or what else do you want? If these do not satisfy you, I can collect more resources. Thank you for your edits and contributions to the page. Keremmaarda (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article is cited, but per Wikipedia:Notability, you need multiple independent sources for verifiability. Around 10 would suffice IMO. More citations from reliable sources can help your cause. Also, kindly keep in mind the paraphrasing. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Foreskin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published

In the media: History is written by whoever can harness the most editors

Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"

Featured content: By your logic,

Concept: Wikipedia policies from other worlds: WP:NOANTLERS

Poetry: "The Sight"

Traffic report: There shall be no slaves in the land of lands, it's a Bollywood jam

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

My bad, thanks for the fix 85.148.56.197 (talk) 10:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

acholi people

sorry i dont know where you are from but i am acholi so i think these are quite reliable becuase ive been to gulu multiple times and if u dont believe me i will even go as far to give what clan i am to prove i am acholi and i can even say a few things like ko pan o etc 92.10.146.102 (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you. But here in Wikipedia, you cannot put your own views which are not backed up by reliable sources. You must provide citations to validate your claims and should not remove already well referenced sections from an article. Thank you and happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not undo my work on blowjob

hey, you just reverted my edit to blowjob. At the moment it just directs to fellatio a slang definition. It should have its own page as the origins of the word blowjob dating to the 1950's or earlier are very different to the latin for fellatio.

There are many supporting references and my edits are just a start. Please do not block me for vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.185.43 (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly consider WP:AFC for the creation of new article. Currently, replacing the redirect page with content that is not properly cited constitute as vandalism. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kelvin Kiptum

On 9 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kelvin Kiptum, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 03:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayodhya dispute

There are some {{convert}} errors at Ayodhya dispute due to your recent script-assisted edits. Please check what you intended and fix where the wikitext refers to $2 and $3 and possibly other problems. Johnuniq (talk) 00:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure thing. Thanks a lot. Looks like the script is doing it a lot now. I'm cross check my edits once again. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about notability and draft page rejection

Hi there, I was hoping you would help me out by sharing your specific concern/s with this draft article you declined recently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Decriminalize_Sex_Work It's only the second page I've created, so I would really appreciate your help as I improve my Wikipedia skillset. I figured since the subject was referenced recently in the Washington Post as well as half a dozen other publications including the NYT over a 4 year period, that it was notable enough for a page. I've read the full Wiki:Notability page and my best guess is that maybe one of the major publications needs to be specifically 'about' the subject rather than just using the subject as a source and explaining what its mission is. If that is the case then I guess I just have to wait until that happens, but if the concern is something else, I'd hate to just wait around when I could actually improve the page and fix the issue. For example, if the problem is that there are not enough citations, then I could easily dig up another dozen articles to include, but nothing like the NYT of course. In any case, thank you in advance for any additional details you can offer about your concerns. Best - Chaotikgood (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Herald/AfC Essentialities might throw some light on the reasons for declining the draft. If you could add more reliable independent citations, then it might come under mainspace worthy draft and then you can resubmit it. Also give WP:MOS a go to see the manual of style we use here. Thanks and happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cannabis laws of Canada by province or territory

How is it "Not constructive" to correct a spelling error? 173.177.6.182 (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?

In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing

Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements

Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!

Traffic report: The calm and the storm

News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes

Humour: New citation template introduced for divine revelations, drug use, and really thinking about it

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John Lookabaugh.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John Lookabaugh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]