User talk:Rawna Praveen singh solanki

December 2022

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ravana Rajputs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 12:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing. Please use accurate edit summaries. Making large, controversial content changes without consensus is disruptive, and you appear to be edit warring. Stop. Zinnober9 (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ravana Rajputs

Hello. Your recent edit to Ravana Rajputs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add people to lists, unless they already have their own article on the English Wikipedia, but you have continued doing so. Please stop - Arjayay (talk) 09:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Major Thakur Dalpat Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Major Thakur Dalpat Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EnormityOP (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing.
Please do not upload copyright images and claim them as your "own work"‎ - Arjayay (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's may copy right but it's related to ravana rajput. That is it. Thank you Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 11:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your edit to Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. While you did credit the Times of India, the content is still under copyright. If you obtained special permission from the publication, please make a note of it on the talk page. Enrico (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Ravana Rajputs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing.
Please do not try to use predatory open access journals as references - Arjayay (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ravana Rajputs

Hello. Your recent edit to Ravana Rajputs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kanha Singh and Vel Singh moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kanha Singh and Vel Singh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dewal Pratiharas. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 10:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 13:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Template:Reply to: Input contains forbidden characters.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because disruptive edits but my aim was not make Disruptive edit I just made small mistakes because I was new to wikipedia and not know many wikipedia policy. Please unblock me to make my mistake and I was graduated you that I will make better edit and not disrupt. Thank you

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked because [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]] but my aim was not make Disruptive edit I just made small mistakes because I was new to wikipedia and not know many wikipedia policy. Please unblock me to make my mistake and I was graduated you that I will make better edit and not disrupt. Thank you |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked because [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]] but my aim was not make Disruptive edit I just made small mistakes because I was new to wikipedia and not know many wikipedia policy. Please unblock me to make my mistake and I was graduated you that I will make better edit and not disrupt. Thank you |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked because [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]] but my aim was not make Disruptive edit I just made small mistakes because I was new to wikipedia and not know many wikipedia policy. Please unblock me to make my mistake and I was graduated you that I will make better edit and not disrupt. Thank you |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}