Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Sønderholm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Sønderholm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I may be misjudging this as I am not familiar with Danish sources, but I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It obviously needs other work - it's very promotional - but it seems more than this. It ahs been in CAT:NN for over 13 years. Boleyn (talk) 10:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Radio, and Denmark. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There does not seem to be much of substanceonline, all I could see were references to films he has appeared in. Are these sufficient? He is described as 'starring which suggests peolple might have heard of him.TheLongTone (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Single source in article is to a movie review without SIGCOV about the subject, ELs are two primary sources and a database. BEFORE found nothing that meets BLPs requirement for strong sourcing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Ping me if sources are found. // Timothy :: talk 12:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.