Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Club Football Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. No new comments after 2 relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National Club Football Association[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Let'srun (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and American football. Let'srun (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There appears to be plenty of coverage relating to this, especially regarding the teams of the league, e.g. from Newspapers.com: Daily Press (again), The Journal News (p2), The Journal News 2 (p2), The Bangor Daily News, The Journal Times (p2), The Index-Journal, The Weekly, etc. – plus non-Newspapers.com: The Lantern, Griffin Daily News, NBC, etc. – I'm leaning keep. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
None of these sources constitute significant coverage about the association itself. The Daily Press articles are not about the association itself, The Journal News article is a routine game report, the The Journal News 2 article is not about the association itself, The Bangor Daily News is passing coverage (only 1 paragraph), The Journal Times has independence issues, ditto with The Index-Journal, The Weekly is another routine game report, The Lantern has independence issues and is also not about the association, Griffin Daily News is a press release, and WCMH (not NBC) also has independence issues and is not about the association itself. Let'srun (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per BeanieFan11's various sources. KatoKungLee (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.