Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Atherton (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 22 December 2023 (Fix Linter errors.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 August 11. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Paul_Atherton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-promotion, not encyclopaedic. Peterforever2 (talk) 10:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See the edits by the user User:Amanda Paul. Clearly the individual concerned. Very few references elsewhere to this individual verifiably not written by him. Peterforever2 (talk) 10:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 12. Snotbot t • c » 11:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See no evidence of notability Seasider91 (talk) 11:40, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete According to this, Paul Atherton is Amanda Paul the article's creator. The question is whether the subject is notable. While IMDB does give good references to his movies and media productions, the google search result's here doesn't seem to indicate that he's very notable. But only more submissions by contributors can resolve the issue. --Artene50 (talk) 00:08, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. IMDB does not indicate notability because it allows anyone who's acted in a movie or TV show to be listed, regardless of their importance. Anyone can create their own IMBD resume. Each footnote may violate WP:COI because they seem to link to works made by Paul Atherton. --Apollo1758 (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Clearly promotional in intent, with green links all the way into the lead. If this is kept, those must be either removed or shifted to an appropriate place at the end of the piece. No opinion as to notability. Carrite (talk) 18:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.