Jump to content

User talk:Karanth1234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Karanth1234 (talk | contribs) at 09:43, 28 December 2023 (→‎Don’t Revert my edit in the name of sock: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Karanth1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Gramanya does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Ekdalian (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@EkdalianI have given source which is neutral.Please refer Gaud saraswat brahmin page where you can find Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.I had dragged this to the talk 2 weeks back but didn’t get which is void of neutrality here.These are the case which occurred and cannot be modified. Karanth1234 (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 17:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a sock at all

@RegentsPark@User:FylindfotberserkI am not a puppet account at all.I have given all my details on the page.Please revisit this conclusion as the whole edit carried out was based on discussions.I know this caste edit section makes you to believe this as sock but I can defend myself!.I didn’t find any investigation here?! Karanth1234 (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark@FylindfotberserkEditing the page constructively cannot be puppets work.You have mentioned sock of a user @Joshpunkarbut investigate this against all parameters.I will be waiting for your investigation.
Regards,
Dr.Karanath. Karanth1234 (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RegentsPark@FylindfotberserkPlease do initiate the investigation and let me defend myself.Not a single vandalism,nor a single personal fight nor a POV push instead I am neutralising the content as per sithush guidelines.So don’t take the decision unilateraly instead give me the chance to prove myself not a puppet sock.Let me know where I crossed my boundaries !.Expecting reply from you both ,these content need to be investigated impartially.
Regards,
Karanth1234 (talk) 14:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unjustified block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karanth1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See all my edits,IP address,All my discussion were constructive,Every edit was based on discussion with the respective user,Tried my level best to Neutralised the biased content.Based on what I got blocked that too as sock!.Request you to reinvestigate this.As I can observe anyone editing Marathi Brahmin or saraswat Brahmin page will be tagged as sock(Reference:Joshi punkar).This is not correct decision.Please revisit this.I can easily defend myself if investigated.Karanth1234 (talk) 14:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I too find it very difficult to believe that you aren't a sock- but yes, others who do the exact same thing as blocked editors will be blocked themselves, see meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You say you've been a Wikipedia editor for the past 12 years here. Given that you edit the exact same articles as Joshi Punekar, it is really hard to believe you're not a sock. RegentsPark (comment) 22:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RegentsParkCent percent I Said it may be till 2013-14 somewhere I have mentioned regarding this in my page please refer it.You must believe that I am no way related to any users.I forgot the user name which I kept at that time so created new one since it is long time elapse.I don’t know which article josh Punekar was editing but I came here to edit due to Gramanya(Refer my chat with Ekdalian,Jonathan and Luke Emily ).The moment they started reverting I started actual research one by one(Refer My Page).I have mentioned my area of interest and current Research.
See my behaviour during my profile and check the contents what I have edited.It May revolve around west coast,Karnataka,Maharashtra.My current research was regarding Gramanya(My Talk between Luke Emily) and by seeing one caste page I found flaws in data(Refer edit).There the editor had used genetic based content and misinterpreted the reference!.The started point it out.
Everything is there infront of you.Use X tool,based on behaviour and all parameters I’ll defend for sure.If I am Sock I need not to defend anything it would have created new account with VPN(Isn’t it?).Rest is on you but check my contributions once(See the time I spent in the talk just as the editor misinterpreted the reference and content).Over to you.
Karanth1234 (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RegentsParkI cannot change the details of my own account page(As It is blocked).I have given my complete details about my usage of Wikipedia regarding when I was there in Wikipedia,When I left and when I resumed back.I have given all my current research,ongoing interest and my name etc.Over to you now.
Karanth1234 (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshi punekar/Archive
OMG,Cent percent I am no way related to this.I don’t have that much time to create accounts like this to edit a pages in Wikipedia that too for years together(I left Wikipedia somewhere around 2015).Now I understood when I entered contents in gramanya or Marathi brahmin while reverting they were using the word sock!.
I can easily defend my self completely,please proceed towards any level of investigation.
@RegentsPark
Karanth1234 (talk) 03:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Recent Edit

@Spinster300I saw your recent reply.Somehow there is some misunderstanding going on here.After Unblock I’ll join the editing process. Many alternate reference are there for that instance.

First Journal about cases and second about Gagabhatt.This reference too can be considered instead of second if you want.

Sarkar, J. (1948). House of Shivaji: (Studies and Documents of Maratha History: Royal Period). India: S.C. Sarkar.page 197.

For that journal shortly I’ll provide the complete reference.Have a nice day. Karanth1234 (talk) 05:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsParkSee many editors are tagging me in the edit process still you have doubt!.Jokes apart,Mine is Zero vandalism just I know to discuss and come up with the fruitful solution.Take the decision soon(I will be there for defence of mine) after Christmas holidays the involvement May reduce due to work.Atleast let me complete the edition of current research!
Karanth1234 (talk) 05:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To Do list

Revisit Upudi census, Madhwacharya details. Shenvi and Gaud saraswat different or same(Luke and Jonathansammy) Gramanya(Luke and ekdalian) Current issue of caste census of Karnataka.(Page Karnataka). Karanth1234 (talk) 05:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t Revert my edit in the name of sock

@EkdalianI request you not to revert my edits.Just see my request to reconsider the block !,Doubting about sock is their work that doesn’t mean that I am sock here.I will defend this . Karanth1234 (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While blocked, you only have access to this page to request to be unblocked. You should not be using this page for any other purpose than contesting your block. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dotI am
clearly stating that I am not a sock ,on which basis I got categorised under this ?Did I reverted any others data or did I vandalised.I just used talk with the editor and clearly discussed the issues.How come you people consider me as sock!.Isn’t that unilateral decision ?
Karanth1234 (talk) 09:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@331dotLet me get the reasons for my block.Editing some page cannot be a reason!.In Wikipedia in which page I have done research there I will edit.
Proper Investigation should be there.IP method or behaviour method,isn’t it? Karanth1234 (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Karanth1234&oldid=1192233009"