This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 13:54, 11 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:54, 11 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
The article seems very suspect to me, with lots of unclear and suspicious claims. Using sugar substitutes is somehow "molecular gastronomy" or a "scientific" approach to cooking?
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
