Talk:Character arc

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Umberto Gonzalez (December 8, 2022). "Warner Bros Didn't Cancel 'Wonder Woman 3,' Patty Jenkins Walked Off the Project (Exclusive)". The Wrap. To underscore her point, according to the first insider, Jenkins sent an email to De Luca that ended with a link to the Wikipedia definition of 'character arc.'

Lost

The whole 'Lost' piece is muddled, too long, and not well written. It should be rewritten in a clear concise manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.199.45 (talk) 04:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the "Lost" section seeming muddled, not all the examples (which are so random) clearly explain how the characters change their points of view; instead it describes the external changes around the character, which may or may not explain a change in the point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.98.184.52 (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad examples

I disagree with the descriptions for Jamie Lannister in Fire and Ice and Henry Hill in Goodfellas these are not the way the characters are or their journeys at all.2A02:C7D:86B:4A00:492A:5151:65A9:C1D8 (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These examples are NOT literature

..this is the qouote: "A Song of Ice and Fire series of books by George R.R. Martin shows numerous examples of complete character arcs. Daenerys Targaryen transforms from a naive young girl to a queen and a conqueror, only to fall from grace after a misuse of power. The character of Jon Snow, undergoes a similar arc of embracing the need to govern and rule and metaphorically "kills the boy and lets the man be born", only to be banished after a misuse of power. Other characters such as Sansa Stark and Jaime Lannister, start out as childish and petty, but once faced with the cruelty of the world, Jaime grows into a mature and wise leader, and Sansa grows into a strong-willed and poised lady."

It is absolutely ridiculous, i just had to say it. My first time here, probably my last. Dunno where to do what so.. accept my appologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.236.172 (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article has many examples that are questionable. If you think they are ridiculous, please be bold and remove them. If other editors question your removals, they will discuss them per WP:BRD—Anita5192 (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]