User:Cinadon36/sandbox
paravertebral block=
was a red link here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rib_fracture&oldid=1185307945
Gazligting
Aote
Em Dash, En Dash, hyphen: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/em-dash-en-dash-how-to-use?fbclid=IwAR14Gpqb-ap70-Te2-XucMW5xRXaqXSkrRszrXTM9CGiTpGbmFP3Wn9Iqro
His philosophical work included, apart from his explanation of natural world, and a mythical component encompassing daimones and other supernatural phenomena. The mythical world of Empedocles though, was interblended to his natural world.[1]
Reliability
Copyvio detectors
- https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en
- https://www.quetext.com/
- https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/
RR
With regard to this, I feel I should tell you that per WP:BRD, you should have started a discussion after your bold edit was reverted, and that per WP:QUO, you should not have re-reverted away from the status quo until consensus is established. It would be nice if you would keep to these established practices in the future!
To include/must pass
See Template:POV when to remove
Citation tools
Templates
{{Citation needed}}
{{vague}}
{{Weasel inline}}
- other staff
{{Tq|πρασινο κείμενο}}
results inπρασινο κείμενο
{{talkquote|αυτά γραφει ενα κειμενο σε αλλη ιστοσελίδα}}
results inαυτά γραφει ενα κειμενο σε αλλη ιστοσελίδα
{{reflist talk}}
- for (not watching, please
{{ping}}
) ---> <small>(not [[Help:Watchlist|watching]], please <code>{{tl|ping}}</code>)</small>
{{hr}}
μπλα μπλα
References
- ^ Primavesi}2008, pp. 251–252.
is produced by {{hr}} <blockquote style="background:#f5faff; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> μπλα-μπλα {{reflist-talk}} </blockquote>
Policy, guidelines and other staff
- WP:HISTRS for Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history)
- WP:NPOV
- WP:EDITORIAL The use of adverbs
- WP:LABEL no use of labels
- WP:DR for dispute resolution
- Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion WP:ONUS
- Pages
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard This is an informal place to resolve small content disputes as part of dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
- Wikipedia:Third opinion Third opinion (3O) is a means to request an outside opinion in a content or sourcing disagreement between two editors
- Essays
if editors are removing good reliable peer reviewed research claiming its 'opinion', make them aware of DS and then take them to AE for Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (see also WP:TE).(from RSN)
- discuss in good faith with you your many editing problems and tell you how to fix them that they have
strong pro-EOKA (pro-Greek) bias
, even if you do it in a WP:WEASEL way. If you continue along that path, I will give you a formal WP:NPA warning.
- WP:RACIST and WP:TERRORIST Value-laden labels—such as calling an organization a cult, an individual a racist, terrorist, or freedom fighter, or a sexual practice a perversion—may express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution.
- Calling POV-pushing POV-pushing is not a threat. It is WP:SPADE
- Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
- Wikipedia:Don't panic
- Wikipedia:Editing policy
- Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state
- Wikipedia:Recentism
- Wikipedia:Rome wasn't built in a day
- Wikipedia:The world will not end tomorrow
- Wikipedia:Too soon
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a work in progress
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a volunteer service
- WP:NOTPERFECT Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required
*WP:NOTFINISHED-WP:WORKINPROGRESS
Rvextensive removal of sourced material, Wikipedia isn't censored
- Wikipedia:Wikipuffery removing "famous" and adjectives