Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annemarie Kleinert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Annemarie Kleinert[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer. Self-promo, only self-published sources provided. Search found only routine promotional sources, no independent sigcov to establish notability. Jdcooper (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, History, Germany, and California. Skynxnex (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. A quick Google Scholar search already finds three published reviews of her books, a good start towards WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I can't find mention of this author, but the links shared above are French reviews of her book, brief but just enough to pass author notability requirements here. Oaktree b (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also get some English discussion of her books using the Jstor link above. Oaktree b (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. After more searching I have still been unable to find more than those three reviews of one book. That's not quite enough for WP:AUTHOR for me, but if another review of any other of her books turns up we could have a weak keep instead. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete, does not pass WP:PROF and is kind of in a grey area when it comes to WP:AUTHOR. The article was created more than a decade ago, but the creator and several other editors have no other contributions other than this article, which on top of how it currently reads, gives off a WP:PROMO vibe. But I cannot object if another editor clearly demonstrates her notability. Aintabli (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete as per David Epstein and Aintabli. Not meeting WP:PROF at all; looks like it falls shore of WP:AUTHOR. Qflib (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wholly self-sourced. No SNG Prof pass evident, nor is a GNG pass evident. Carrite (talk) 20:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.