Talk:East Coast Main Line Route Utilisation Strategy

Trains: in UK / Operations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Wikisource[edit]

I can't see that the Wikisource comment at the top of the article is justified. The ECML RUS document is 209 pages long! This article provides a very edited distillation of what I see as the key points, and considerable effort went into achieving this. It's also in the context of a number of Wikipedia articles on the RUS theme.

The Groups of gaps and issues section does use the main classification and some descriptions used in the Gaps and options chapter of the ECML RUS, as well as the nomenclature of the chief interventions (Options A through C), but the text is in no way merely a copy.

It also relates the ECML RUs document to subsequent developments, based on NR's published plans, including later RUSs. This section could of course be expanded as events unfold.

I will remove the notice after 7 days. If Abductive has any specific suggestions to strengthen the article, he/she can make them here (or do the edits of course).

Ivanberti (talk) 09:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]