This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 07:03, 18 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Korea}}, {{WikiProject Songs}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:03, 18 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Korea}}, {{WikiProject Songs}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
It seems that there is a bit of a disagreement here.
@Paper9oll, your reasoning that you provided doesn't make sense. Nobody intentionally rewords the commercial perf. section from number to position just to reflect the chart tables, in fact, I have never seen any article use the word position in place of number in that way (outside of the ones you contribute largely to). "Number" x is far more common in usage regarding charts than "position" x is, not just on Wikipedia, but in music journalism in general. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk18:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nkon21 I'm not saying if it's intenationally or not, but I'm just finding it weird that number was used on commercial performance section when all of the charts section's table(s) and discographies table(s) uses Peak chart "position" as supposed to Peak chart "number" if number is more common usage nor Peak chart "position number" which is more precise and explicit hence having lack of consistency. Personally, to me, both words are certainly equally common in terms of "knowing it" (can't remember what is the actual terms for "knowing it" but anyway ...) and also in terms of usage. Maybe how I interpret it is slightly different, I simply read it "xyz debuted at position [twenty]" in which by common sense the twenty is of course a number ... anyway, I do get what you're trying to say but not sure if you get what I'm trying to say as well. —Paper9oll(🔔 • 📝)04:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do get what you are trying to say, but "position" x just reads a bit more awkward and "number" x is what is used virtually everywhere. Cases where I've seen positions used more are when it says something like "...the song reached the position of number x" and whatnot like in this article. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk02:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree with Nkon on this one. "position x" just sounds a bit awkward to me. Maybe its cause I am used to seeing "number x" most of the time. EN-Jungwon08:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
