Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeds hip hop
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Leeds hip hop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 14:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and England. Owen× ☎ 14:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete. I'm typically unsympathetic to WP:TNT votes, and there is some sourcing available [1], but I'm quite confident that this article is useless now, was created by somone who made the term up, and see no evidence of a distinct "style" vs. routine coverage of regional artists in the genre. No reason to think this needs a standalone article. Mach61 (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.