Talk:Wrongful dismissal

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Employment at will

What are possible grounds for a wrongful dismissal suit in an employment at will state such as Virginia? Sarsaparilla (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal are best treated seperately. From a Canadian perspective, the term "wrongful dismissal" is used to describe a specific type of legal claim under the common law. Thho2008 (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UK wrongful dismissal error

The UK section states "An employer is only entitled to dismiss an employee without notice...if the contract says so" - however I believe there remains a 2 week statutory minimum. ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.83.249 (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the legal reference book: "The Law of Dismissal in Canada"

Hi @Arrlaw: Thanks for noticing my edit. You reverted the addition of a reference to what seems to be the lawyers most renowned reference book on Canadian dismissal law. the subjct of this page's section. You wrote:"References should support the article, and not be promotional".

Many wiki pages include references to other sources,books etc. It is helpful to the wiki reader to be informed of other, significant resources - I imagine we would be in agreement on that sub-point?

Would you be able to suggest a way the page can inform the wiki reader - but avoid your concern about being 'promotional'?

many thanksCanterburyUK (talk) 10:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If other articles are being inappropriately used to promote books or other media, then the proper action to take is to correct the article.

References are provided to support the content of the article. If you have a reliable source that can be used in that manner, then cite the source in support of the content.

Some works will be suitable for inclusion in a "further reading" section. Arllaw (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]